sariyawashere
sariyawashere sariyawashere
  • 04-06-2020
  • Social Studies
contestada

Question:
According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or
unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?​

Respuesta :

sindlea
sindlea sindlea
  • 04-06-2020

Answer:

It was unconstitutional because traditionally, no tribal government or chief held authority over all the Cherokees. But in 1721, South Carolina colonists succeeded in persuading the Cherokees to choose a principal chief for the entire tribe to negotiate selling some of its hunting grounds.

Answer Link
kassidyjenna2014 kassidyjenna2014
  • 04-06-2020

Answer:unconstitutional

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

-2 5/22 as a decimal
if you had been a merchant in Europe during 1400s would you have supported attempts to find new routes to Asia
How did the rise of the Knights of Labor impact the Populist movement in the late 1800s? The rise of the Knights of Labor led to the creation of granges and far
President Kennedy was relatively unsuccessful in passing civil rights legislation during his time in office because __________. a. congressional Democrats were
A European swallow flies about 11 meters in 1 second.How many kilometers could it flyvin 5 minutes.
any change or random error in a DNA sequence
Politicians who supported America building a canal across the narrow section of Central America argued that
what is the metaphor in Poison by Roald Dahl
If (on earth) an object falls 18m and loses 36J of GPE. What is the objects mass?
what did Buddha say caused human suffering